Search Term Record
Metadata
Name |
legal document |
Related Records
-
011.013.026 - Letter
A series of three type written letters from the United Shoe Machinery Company regarding a law suit against the Ralphs Norwich Ltd. and Moenus Maschinenfabrik A.G. for a patent infringement of patent number 351386 covering the model D Heel Seat Lasting Machine. The first letter is a five page letter written on March 17, 1936 to the lawyer of the United Shoe Machinery Corporation A.W. Todd Esquire by George B. Cooke of the law offices of Bristo...
Record Type: Archive
-
011.013.027 - Letter
A type written letter from attorney George B. Cooke to A.W. Todd Esquire written on April 23, 1935 regarding Power of Attorney. The letter states: "Dear Mr. Todd, I enclose the Power of Attorney which you handed me to-day. My father, you know, will be very disappointed not to have seen you and although I am very glad that the telegram you have received from Italy puts an end to the immediate difficulty with which you appeared to be faced...
Record Type: Archive
-
011.013.029 - Letter
A series of type-written letters regarding the copyright infringement lawsuit of the British United Shoe Manufacturing Company and the United Shoe Manufacturing Corporation versus Holdfast Boots Limited, A.T. Ralphs (Norwich) Ltd., and Moenus Maschinenfabrik A.G. The lawsuit was based on the copyright infringement of patent number 351386, the model D Heel Seat Lasting Machine. The first letter is a one page type-written letter from attorney of...
Record Type: Archive
-
011.013.030 - Deed
A one page type written -letter written on March 18, 1932 from attorney Henry Cooke from the law offices of Bristows, Cooke & Carpmael to J.H. Connor Esquire of the United Shoe Machinery Corporation regarding an updated version of the deed for the United Shoe Machinery Corpration and that the company owns 95% of the voting power. Also, the revised deed for the United Shoe Machinery Corporation, detailing the new edition of the deed that the co...
Record Type: Archive
-
011.013.031 - Deed
A three page type-written letter written on February 27 from attorney Henry Cooke from the law offices of Bristows, Cooke & Carpmael to J.H. Connor Esquire of the United Shoe Machinery Corporation regarding a clarification of the deed for the United Shoe Machinery Corporation and outlines the agreements made between the United Shoe Manufacturing Company and its subsidiary companies in which certain obligations shall be carried out. Also, attac...
Record Type: Archive
-
011.013.032 - Letter
A four page type-written letter written on July 14, 1933, which is a Clarifying Agreement from attorney Henry Cooke of the law firm Bristows, Cooke & Carpmael to United Shoe Machinery Corporation attorney J.H. Connor in regards to a clause in the companies contract. The clause suggests "that, in purchasing, either of the principals to the supplemental agreement could act as agents for its subsidiary and thus obtain goods at cost for it from the o...
Record Type: Archive
-
011.013.033 - Letter
A three page type-written letter written on June 1, 1933, which is a Clarifying Agreement from attorney Henry Cooke of the law firm Bristows, Cooke & Carpmael to United Shoe Machinery Corporation attorney J.H. Connor in regards to an opinion of "the communication of inventions and the supply of plant particularly having regard to the question of subsidiaries, and secondly, that he should consider Mr. Chase's draft and revise it as he deemed it ne...
Record Type: Archive
-
011.013.034 - Document
A copy of a four page type-written document that is a Supplemental Indenture for the United Shoe Machinery Corporation from 1933. The document is a contract that details how the United Shoe Machinery Corporation and its British subsidiary company The British United Shoe Company Limited do not share the same rights and benfits due in part to certain differences in laws between the United States and Great Britain, yet both companies are in agreemen...
Record Type: Archive
-
011.013.035 - Document
A copy of a four page type-written document that is a Supplemental Indenture for the United Shoe Machinery Corporation from 1933. The document is a contract that details how the United Shoe Machinery Corporation and its British subsidiary company The British United Shoe Company Limited do not share the same rights and benfits due in part to certain differences in laws between the United States and Great Britain, yet both companies are in agreemen...
Record Type: Archive
-
011.013.036 - Document
A copy of a four page type-written document that is a Supplemental Indenture for the United Shoe Machinery Corporation from 1933. The document is a contract that details how the United Shoe Machinery Corporation and its British subsidiary company The British United Shoe Company Limited do not share the same rights and benfits due in part to certain differences in laws between the United States and Great Britain, yet both companies are in agreemen...
Record Type: Archive
-
011.013.037 - Document
A copy of a ten page type-written document from 1933 that is an opinion of the British United Shoe Machinery Company's Valentine Holmes regarding patent rights for the British United Shoe Machinery Company in Great Britain over the patent rights for the United Shoe Machinery Corporation in the United States. Valentine Holmes believes that the British Company owns their existing patents and patent rights for the United Kingdom, all further patents...
Record Type: Archive
-
011.013.038 - Document
A one page type-written document from 1933 from the British United Shoe Machinery Company's Valentine Holmes regarding five clauses to Recitals 4 to 7 in the contract for the British United Shoe Machinery Company. He gives his opinion for each of the five clauses. The clauses are for patent rights and patents for the British United Shoe Machinery Company.
Record Type: Archive
-
011.013.039 - Document
A three page type-written document from May 31, 1933 from the British United Shoe Machinery Company's Valentine Holmes regarding his notes on the American Draft Agreement from the United Shoe Machinery Corporation in the United States. Valentine Holmes writes notes on Recitals and Clauses in the British United Shoe Machinery Company's contract. His note on the Second Recital in the contract is that he does not believe that the subsidiary companie...
Record Type: Archive
-
011.013.040 - Document
A copy of a ten page type-written document from 1933 that is an opinion of the British United Shoe Machinery Company's Valentine Holmes regarding patent rights for the British United Shoe Machinery Company in Great Britain over the patent rights for the United Shoe Machinery Corporation in the United States. Valentine Holmes believes that the British Company owns their existing patents and patent rights for the United Kingdom, all further patents...
Record Type: Archive
-
011.013.041 - Letter
A two page type-written letter from May 30, 1934 from attorney Henry Cooke of the law firm Bristows, Cooke & Carpmael to the attorney of the United Shoe Machinery Corporation J.H. Connor in reply to a letter that J.H. Connor sent Henry Cooke. The letter details defining what a subsidiary company is and how it needs to be redefined in the case of the British United Shoe Machinery Company. He goes on to question whether or not J.H. Connor would be ...
Record Type: Archive
-
011.013.042 - Document
A copy of an eleven page type-written document from 1933 that is an opinion of the British United Shoe Machinery Company's Valentine Holmes regarding patent rights for the British United Shoe Machinery Company in Great Britain over the patent rights for the United Shoe Machinery Corporation in the United States. Valentine Holmes believes that the British Company owns their existing patents and patent rights for the United Kingdom, all further pat...
Record Type: Archive
-
011.013.043 - Report, Annual
A four type-written annual report of the D.V.S.G. External Assets for the United Shoe Machinery Corporation from April 9. 1948. The report is written in French, English and in German. The first part of the report outlines pending foreign matters in the countries Holland, Czecho-Slavakia, Austria, Hungary, Yugoslavia, Switzerland, Poland, and Russia. The second part of the report outlines the machinery that was leased to the different countries an...
Record Type: Archive
-
011.013.044 - Memorandum
A forty page type-written memorandum with twelve pages of attachments from July 12, 1949 from the United Shoe Machinery Corporation regarding International Transactions and the United States Anti-Trust Laws. The purpose of the memorandum "is to design to call attention to certain laws of the United States which must be borne in mind when doing business abroad or with citizens of foreign nations. The subject-matter has become of special interest ...
Record Type: Archive
-
011.013.045 - Documents
A 130 page legal document from the United Shoe Machinery Corporation from the civil legal court case from September 5, 1950 in the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York. The court case, docket number 24-13 is the United States of America v. Imperial Chemical Industries, Ltd., et al.,. The plaintiff is the United States of America and the defendants are Imperial Chemical Industries, Ltd., Imperial Chemical Indus...
Record Type: Archive
-
011.013.046 - Memorandum
A two page type-written memorandum from the United Shoe Machinery Corporation from Robert Gibson to N.B. Todd and J.W. Coolidge from October 10, 1950 regarding Anti-Trust complaints. The memorandum states: "Your attention is invited to U.S. v. Imperial Chemical Industries, Ltd., et al., Civil Action 24-13 (Complaint filed S.D.N.Y. 6 Jan. 1944). A copy of the complaint is attached. I have not yet examined the file in this litigation because of...
Record Type: Archive
